lol, nice deflection.
there were no 66 book bibles before the 16th century. PERIOD.
END OF DISCUSSION.
If someone wants to believe that NO ONE had an accurate Bible before the 16th century, well, there is not much anyone can really do for such a person other than pray for them.
I suspect such a person also believes many other things that no one believed before the 16th century, but that’s a whole other story, isn’t it?
there were no 66 book bibles before the 16th century. PERIOD.
If that makes you feel better....ok. END OF DISCUSSION.
If someone wants to believe that NO ONE had an accurate Bible before the 16th century, well, there is not much anyone can really do for such a person other than pray for them.
I said that by 400 AD the 27 NT and 39 OT were agreed upon by the church. The apocrypha was not considered as inspired as the rest of the OT. Please see my post #66.
A more accurate statement would be the RCC has not had an accurate Bible since the Council of Trent.
It's been a fun discussion.