Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone
Firstly note that it's not just "me" who agrees, but this is the view of the Church and has been since it was handed down from the Apostles

Sorry, to your second point, that is equally incorrect -- these are in line with teachings. And it does not go in line that this is conjecture, otherwise one would agree with say the Ethiopian Church that Apocalypse should have been added.

Stick with the Word, Jesus Christ, not just part of this

538 posted on 06/12/2014 9:40:24 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
Well, we're going to have to agree to disagree.

I find nothing in the Bible that elevates Mary to the position she has as espoused by the roman catholic church.

The Apostles never taught the Assumption, the Immaculate Conception, her perpetual virginity, her being the Queen of Heaven, etc.

These developed over time after the canon of the NT was written and are not Biblical teachings.

Search the Word...you'll see.

Good talking with you.

549 posted on 06/13/2014 4:50:38 AM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson