Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone
I've read it --> note that if you say places..., that is incorrect. Also note that the term does not imply an equal part in the redemption since He is the only redeemer and she was in need of redemption. The hand-maid of the Lord
525 posted on 06/11/2014 10:48:03 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
He is the only redeemer and she was in need of redemption. The hand-maid of the Lord

True, but I think the point of contention is whether Mary should be elevated to a special status when the scripture strongly indicates that she didn't even believe in him as the savior - at the time that he was in the flesh at least.

528 posted on 06/11/2014 11:58:11 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
I've read it --> note that if you say places..., that is incorrect. Also note that the term does not imply an equal part in the redemption since He is the only redeemer and she was in need of redemption. The hand-maid of the Lord

I am glad you agree Christ is the only Redeemer.

If one compares the catechism with the Bible there are many things in the catechism that are non-Biblical.

The catechism certainly does appear to take Mary to another level. There is nothing in the Bible about her praying for our salvation, intervening for us, Queen of Heaven, etc. That's all man-made conjecture.

Stick with the reading of the Word. Ditch the catechism.

531 posted on 06/12/2014 5:21:08 AM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson