Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus; Mr Rogers; knarf; GeronL; HarleyD; Greetings_Puny_Humans; redleghunter
This is what just galls me: Every single Protestant discussion of the canon or St. Jerome's opinion of the canon excludes his prefaces to the Book of Judith and to the Book of Tobit. Every one. And this, then, is the hope Catholics have for the salvation of Protestants: that they have had no free choice to follow the true Church which Jesus, himself, founded. They have been led astray by "fools and slanderers," who have concealed the truth from them.

Why that sounds just what so many RCs do. I see post after post damning Luther for dissenting from the canon Trent affirmed, as if he was a maverick dissenting from an infallible indisputable canon, rather than scholarly disagreements continuing thru centuries and right into Trent. With the only infallible canon being over Luther's dead body. And such things as that 2Mac. 12 teaches purgatory. Or that presbuteros means priest. Etc. And parroting dubious or misleading quotes from Luther, and presenting him as i we saw him as a pope. And RCs believe them!

93 posted on 11/05/2013 4:11:34 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212

Boy, you’re late to the discussion. Try reading the papal bull confirming the Council of Florence, which included bishops representing all but one of the Eastern kingdoms.


94 posted on 11/05/2013 6:17:51 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson