But, it's all based on the Bible. Oh dear; what is to be done?
Not really. Large chunks of the Bible have to be systematically ignored to produce the void necessary to insert the Armstrongisms. Keep in mind that every one of these -isms came into being through some strong central authority figure, a mini-pope if you will. It is my experience that apart from Jesus Himself, every such group has the capacity to distort the faith once delivered to the saints. God is infallible, but humans aren't. Just the way it is. And I know this raises a whole set of challenges, and I don't really want to go over what has been gone over so many times before, by better people than me. I just think that in the end its a waste of time in theological debates to get caught up in any fallible human authority, as if either side of this debate had a monopoly on the weaknesses of being human in a fallen world. Peace, SR
“But, it’s all based on the Bible. Oh dear; what is to be done?”
Are you of their cult? There’s not one thing in their heresy that is based on the Bible. That’s why he wasn’t able to reply to my post when I defined his doctrine and responded to it. You’re more than welcome to pick up his cause, of course. In fact, I’d really like it if you did. Perhaps after you’re reduced to a quivering mass of jelly, you’ll hear the effectual call of God and repent of your sins.