[golux]

A highly detailed examination of a perfectly subjective idea: that the lender is not only culpable if his dollars are ill-employed by the borrower, he is also guilty if payments on the loan - what is it? - "wears down or drains" the borrower?

The lender is guilty if there is a default by the borrower.

The lender is guilty if the borrower is stressed.

The lender is guilty if the borrower agrees to terms the borrower later deems unfair.

And what is the faith, invariably, of this guilty, guilty lender of whom we speak? Hmm?

[annalex]

The lender is guilty

Depends on whether he gave a productive loan or unproductive one. If he loaned money for an enterprise with an upside, and lost, he is not guilty at all. He perhaps should have charged more interest.

And what is the faith...

The faith discussed here is the Catholic faith, the one that teaches the truth.