[RFEngineer]

I am not voting for Romney based on him being a Northeastern liberal.

That should be enough. If you then go on to say “He’s a religious Heretic, and should not vote against Jesus”, then you are overstepping the bounds of political reason, politeness and the Constitution.

[DJ MacWoW]

"If you then go on to say “He’s a religious Heretic, Moslem and should not vote against Jesus”, then you are overstepping the bounds of political reason, politeness and the Constitution."

See how that works? He uses lefty logic. And fails.

[little jeremiah]

Was Obama’s affiliation with Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Church off limits the way Romeny’s Mormonism is off limits, in your opinion?

A simple yes or no would suffice.

[humblegunner]

If you then go on to say “He’s a religious Heretic, and should not vote against Jesus”, then you are overstepping the bounds of political reason, politeness and the Constitution.

Negative, dude.

Officially there can be no religious test of a candidate.

As a private citizen, I can use any damned criteria I want.

No votes for people who wear glasses or have big ears or whatever I choose.

You may think it unreasonable, but I'm perfectly within my rights to apply these conditions.

[Elsie]

I see you have chosen to IGNORE 113: so be it.

---

That should be enough. If you then go on to say “He’s a religious Heretic, and should not vote against Jesus”, then you are overstepping the bounds of political reason, politeness and the Constitution.

Your logic ability seems to be lacking.