The “no antagonism” guideline applies to “ecumenical” threads NOT “caucus” threads.
For an article to qualify for “ecumenical” discussion it must not be antagonistic, e.g. mention beliefs which would antagonize other Freepers.
LDS Caucus privileges are forfeit.
***
I was right a few weeks ago Praise the Lord you can’t even bookmark the thead let alone save it with the title in your own personal word because the title was once omited!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2819274/replies?c=62
thread http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-religion/2650662/posts?page=1
Part 1 - Craig Evans vs. Bart Ehrman Debate: Does the New Testament Misquote Jesus?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRQ9WaxEjvc&feature=related
too all seekers of truth does truth matter?
... seems not to those who never really read they Bible or study it they let others do their thinking for them but the Lord told all of us to Search the Scriptures whether those things were so and not to relie on others.
John 5:39
39 ¶Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
Acts 17:11
11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
eems not to those who never really read they Bible or study it they let others do their thinking for them
- - - - - -
OK, that is REALLY REALLY funny coming from a Mormon. Seriously.
When I really read the Bible, I LEFT MORMONISM! I know no Mormon who thinks for themselves about faith, the Bible, or religion, “the Church” does the thinking for them.
Paragon? Are you back?
He'll GLADLY take you in!
Resty; why don't you SEARCH your soul to see if you ACCEPT or REJECT the 'kind' words your LEADERS have said about CHRISTIANS over the years to see if you are going to CLAIM those words or REJECT them.
Would you get back to us when you have an answer?
We'd LOVE to know!