I don’t recall that there is such a passage.
The Church accepts this for teaching, not as canon. This book tells of how the Mother of God was dedicated from birth for the task God had set for her.
LOL There is a reason it wasn’t included in canon. And there is a reason they allowed it for teaching. They liked that parts that agreed with extra Biblical teaching of the church but knew that to include it with canon would make all of their canon anathema.
The RCC has also “accepted” the bodily assumption of Mary. Any scriptural evidence of that?