Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

I’d say isn’t that just your private interpretation. Besides what authority decided that say Revelation belonged in the Bible considering a lot of early Christians refused to recognize it as inspired?

The Byzantine Church doesn’t use readings from Revelation because of its late addition.

And Luther advocated declaring that Revelation was apocryphal.

What makes Luther wrong objectively speaking
?


442 posted on 11/01/2011 4:54:34 PM PDT by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: rzman21
>>What makes Luther wrong objectively speaking?<<

The understanding of both Daniel’s prophesy and Revelation were sealed until the “time of the end”. God is and was in control and Revelation and the understanding of Daniels prophesies are beginning. I would say God controlled when Revelation was included.

457 posted on 11/01/2011 5:55:11 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson