“You can take whatever it is you want. I don’t tell you what you can and can’t accept. If it disagrees with the 66 books I accept I won’t.”
So then you really aren’t arguing that the books are inspired. You are arguing that people should accept the books that the want to accept.
This doesn’t sound like a very strong defense of scripture...
I’m “arguing” that if a book or writing contains information or concepts that disagrees with or is in opposition to the 66 books it can’t be considered inspired. Sola Scriptura simply states that all doctrine or practices agree with and can be justified by scripture.