Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice

I apologize for thinking there was a certain standard to be met when one posts such things, i.e. that the statement is duly and credibly referenced to the original source.

I apologize for thinking that when one posts something, one should be responsible for proving that what was posted was indeed truthful and accurate.

Sorry, I have higher standards for myself than that. If I post something, I do not expect others to have to prove it one way or the other.

Knowing now that any specious statement can be made as long as the original purveyor of the statement is duly noted will be of great use to me in the future here on the RF.

I will waste less time treating such things as honest debate and see it for what it is.


357 posted on 11/01/2011 8:52:31 AM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: Jvette
As "pious" as this all sounds, I challenge you to actually walk the walk you've just declared. I shall read your posts with due diligence from this point on, making certain that you've evidenced correct research for accuracy and truth before quoting matters.

such as...the conversation that is happening right now, in the most current post. The bodily assumption of Mary. since you are Catholic, I assume you believe this. Can you show me from correct research for accuracy and truth PROOF that she was bodily assumed? Scriptures? No? Just give me your sources that truthfully and accurately prove this doctrinal belief. Thank you.

384 posted on 11/01/2011 11:52:38 AM PDT by smvoice (Who the *#@! is Ivo of Chatre & why am I being accused of not linking to his quote?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson