Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg
>>It's not like there wasn't an opinion, it's just that we don't like to get all official and stuff unless we have to.<<

Still it would clearly obvious from the very fact that they had to “debate the matter” that there had been no clear consensus up until that time and debate or differing with the “decision” was not an option after that time for fear of reprimand or excommunication.

331 posted on 11/01/2011 6:06:46 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
Still it would clearly obvious from the very fact that they had to “debate the matter” that there had been no clear consensus up until that time and debate or differing with the “decision” was not an option after that time for fear of reprimand or excommunication.

Yes. Just as for the Judaizers after Acts 15. That seems to be the way it works.

334 posted on 11/01/2011 6:30:36 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson