I am asking you to PLEASE handle this. If I were going to websites for information, I would give the link. It’s what I keep TRYING to say: I am NOT going to websites. The only *link* I could give is the link to the Bible study classes I attend. Except they don’t have a *website*. I could give the names, phone numbers and addresses of all who attend the Bible study classes, I could give the name and address of my Church, but they don’t have a website to LINK TO. I give the information that I get: the author, the name of his work, the chapters, the page numbers, whatever I get. I am very tired of being accused of visiting nefarious websites when I don’t even KNOW WHO they are, or WHO THEY LINK TO. How can I control something that I don’t even go to? The only website I visit is Williams-Sonoma.com. And the only “biblical” items they sale are wine decanters. Either let me set Judith Anne straight once and for all, or ban me. But I cannot be responsible for places I do NOT visit. This happens time after time around here with Judith Anne. I don’t have time for it, you don’t have time for it, but I think she does. And takes pleasure in the continuing accusations against me. Please give me some kind of way to end this continual lie she posts about me. Thanks, smvoice
The why don’t you qualify it with an “I” or in my “Bible Study Group” and give the name of the series???
I think that is what Judith Anne is asking you. Just provide something so that we might know it is legit.
Yes, I know I’m busting into the middle of a conversation, but somehow I am able to qualify all my posts with a link. Why couldn’t you do the same, voice?
The Code of Canon Law and Catholic World Magazine are part of your Bible Study Classes? That’s where the snippets in the post came from?
Okie doke..
THIS time people have seen the quote/link connection for themselves. Anyone should be able to live with that. Those too sensitive for the open forum should stick with the caucus threads.
“Either let me set Judith Anne straight once and for all, or ban me.”
I vote for neither.
As far as “taking pleasure in the continuing accusations” I have not accused you of anything, nor would I take pleasure in doing so. That is, in itself, an ugly accusation. I forgive you.
On open threads, thin-skinned people are the disruptors, according to the RM.