To: DustyMoment
The King James version is known to be fraught with errors, misinterpretations and incorrect translations of Aramaic, rewriting parts the way King James thought they should be, removing some books and adding in others, and flat out making stuff up to coincide with his version of Jesus' life. Got a list of these we can see; instead of us hoping that you are telling the truth?
115 posted on
10/04/2011 6:21:51 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Elsie
Got a list of these we can see; instead of us hoping that you are telling the truth?You can start with these: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/feb/19/bible-king-james-version-david-edgar http://bible.org/article/why-i-do-not-think-king-james-bible-best-translation-available-today
133 posted on
10/04/2011 10:51:34 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson