Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE; MarkBsnr
"...The truth is that the Protoevangelium was circulated and read widely amongst Christians and formed much of the traditions that developed before NT Scripture was compiled."

Simply one more forgery which was read and circulated. False Tradition is still false, pious or not.

The TRUTH? The truth is that this was a forgery, NOT written by James. Condemned by the Church!

AND yet this apochryphal fabrication is BELIEVED more than the actual WORD of GOD!

908 posted on 06/22/2011 7:37:27 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]


To: bkaycee
The TRUTH? The truth is that this was a forgery, NOT written by James.

So was Matthew 28:19. So was 1 John 5:7. So was Mark 16:9-20. How about the whole of John 21? And a whole raft of others. Do you admit it or not? If yes, then I admire your willingness to grasp what is. If not, then what?

AND yet this apochryphal fabrication is BELIEVED more than the actual WORD of GOD!

You haven't been paying attention, have you? The Gospels are considered the pinnacle of God's revelation to man. The rest of the NT is seen through the prism of the Gospels and OT. The OT is seen through the New. As a matter of fact, for several hundred years, the OT was thought to be spurious and not necessarily for early Christians. It took the Councils to bring them back into general acceptance.

924 posted on 06/22/2011 5:28:37 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 908 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson