Well I suppose then the disagreement comes down to who gets to determine what Scriptures have weight. I can see why Paul is not a big time favorite given he sure did neglect to defiy Mary. I mean really here we have Paul, sinner indeed, elected to pen the majority of the 'NEW' Testament, and all his Epistles instruct that salvation comes from the Heavenly Father in Christ... and then imagine Paul says allllll have sinned and short of the glory, that 'grace' comes from Christ.
Might even say that Mary's overflowing perfect grace came from Christ.
Well of course he didn't deify Mary. If he did he would have been a rank heretic and his Epistles would have been speedily burned rather than circulated to all the Churches. If he deified Mary we wouldn't be reading him at every Mass practically.
And yes, the problem is one of "who gets to determine which Scriptures have weight." I prefer to side with the majority on this. And that's the majority over 2000 of Christian history, with special emphasis on those writers of the early centuries known as the "Church Fathers".
Not only MIGHT we say that Mary's grace ALL comes from Christ, we MUST say it. Not a stitch of it is her own. From the definition
All know, likewise, how eager the bishops have been to profess openly and publicly, even in ecclesiastical assemblies, that Mary, the most holy Mother of God, by virtue of the foreseen merits of Christ, our Lord and Redeemer, was never subject to original sin, but was completely preserved from the original taint, and hence she was redeemed in a manner more sublime.Everything she has, she gained from God who saved her.
>> Might even say that Mary’s overflowing perfect grace came from Christ. <<
Absolutely. But Christ pre-existed Mary.
>> I mean really here we have Paul, sinner indeed, elected to pen the majority of the ‘NEW’ Testament, and all his Epistles instruct that salvation comes from the Heavenly Father in Christ... and then imagine Paul says allllll have sinned and short of the glory, that ‘grace’ comes from Christ. <<
It’s been explained that Paul isn’t saying what Protestants scandalously insist he is saying. But, yes, if Paul HAD contradicted the gospels, the gospels would’ve remained, and Paul’s writings would’ve been given the boot, even though Paul’s letters were likely penned before at least two or three of the gospels.
Come on... lets be serious ...
And the angel came in unto her and said Hail thou that art highly favoured the Lord is with thee blessed art thou among women
to make graceful, endow with grace
Original Word: χαριτόω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: charitoó
Phonetic Spelling: (khar-ee-to'-o)
Short Definition: I favor, bestow freely on Definition: I favor, bestow freely on.
Cognate: 5487 xaritóō (from 5486 /xárisma, "grace," see there) properly, highly-favored because receptive to God's grace. 5487 (xaritóō) is used twice in the NT (Lk 1:28 and Eph 1:6), both times of God extending Himself to freely bestow grace (favor).
to make graceful, endow with grace Original Word: χαριτόω Part of Speech: Verb Transliteration: charitoó Phonetic Spelling: (khar-ee-to'-o) Short Definition: I favor, bestow freely on Definition: I favor, bestow freely on. Cognate: 5487 xaritóō (from 5486 /xárisma, "grace," see there) properly, highly-favored because receptive to God's grace. 5487 (xaritóō) is used twice in the NT (Lk 1:28 and Eph 1:6), both times of God extending Himself to freely bestow grace (favor).
Mary was chosen before the foundation of the world to be the human mother of Christ.. so indeed the blessing to her was "past tense" .