Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How The Reformation Changed The Church
frontline.org ^ | Dr. Peter Hammond

Posted on 02/05/2011 11:07:42 AM PST by Gamecock

In the book of Judges we read about another generation which arose, which knew neither the Lord nor what He had done (Judges 2:10). Today, it appears that a generation has arisen, which like Israel under the Judges, knows little of either the Lord nor of what He did during the time of the Protestant exodus and the struggles in the wilderness, which followed in the 16th and 17th century. Sometimes this is from a cowardly dislike of controversy and confrontation. But few people seem to understand either the evils from which the Reformation delivered us or the blessings which the Reformation won for us.

The Reformation delivered the Church from gross ignorance and spiritual darkness The church, before the Reformation, was a church without the Bible. And a church without a Bible is as useless as a lighthouse without light, a candlestick without a candle, or a motor vehicle without an engine. The priests and people knew scarcely anything about God’s Word or the way of salvation in Christ.

Bishop J.C. Ryle described the situation: “The immense majority of the clergy did little more than say masses and offer up pretended sacrifices, repeat Latin prayers and chant Latin hymns (which of course most of the people could not understand), hear confessions, grant absolutions, give extreme unction, and take money to get dead people out of purgatory.”

Bishop Latimer observed: “When the devil gets influence in a church, up go candles and down goes preaching.”

Quarterly sermons (that is, once every three months) were prescribed to the clergy, but not insisted upon. Latimer noted that while the mass was never left unsaid for a single Sunday, sermons might be omitted for 20 Sundays in succession. Indeed, to preach much was to incur the suspicion of being a heretic.

Bishop Hooper, who along with Bishop Latimer was burned alive at the stake under Queen Mary, did a survey in 1551 and found that out of 311 clergy in his Diocese, 168 were unable to repeat the Ten Commandments, 31 of those 168 could not even say in which part of the Scripture the Ten Commandments were to be found, 40 could not tell where the Lord’s Prayer was written, and 31 of the 40 did not even know who the author of the Lord’s Prayer was!

Bishop Ryle summarized the situation: “Before the Reformation was a religion without knowledge, without faith and without lively hope – a religion without justification, regeneration and sanctification – a religion without any clear views of Christ and the Holy Ghost. Except in rare instances, it was little better than an organized system of Mary worship, saint worship, image worship, relic worship, pilgrimages, alms giving, formalism, ceremonialism, processions, penances, absolutions, masses and blind obedience to the priests. It was a huge higgledy-piggledy of ignorance and idolatry, and serving an unknown God by deputy. The only practical result was that the priests took the people’s money and undertook to secure their salvation. And the people flattered themselves that the more they gave to the priests, the more sure they were to go to Heaven!”

The Reformation delivered the church from childish superstitions The Roman Catholic church, before the Reformation, taught its members to seek spiritual benefit from so-called relics of dead saints and to treat them with divine honor. Calvin’s “Inventory of Relics” and Hobart Seymour’s “Pilgrimage to Rome” catalog some of the ludicrous swindles which were perpetrated by the church of Rome. This included pieces of wood “of the true cross” enough to load a large ship, thorns professing to be part of the Saviour’s crown of thorns, enough to make a huge faggot, at least 14 nails said to have been used at the Crucifixion, four spearheads – each purporting to be the one which pierced our Lord’s side, at least three seamless coats of Christ, for which the soldiers cast lots, Saint James’s hand, bones of Mary Magdalene, toenails from Saint Edmund, some bread, purported to have been used by Christ at the Last Supper, a girdle of the Virgin Mary and milk from the Virgin Mary! The Royal Commissioners of Henry VIII examined a vial at the Abbey in Gloucestershire, which was said to contain the blood of Christ! The Commissioners found that it contained the blood of a duck.

There were literally thousands of profane and vile inventions, fabrications and deceptions, which Roman priests imposed on the people before the Reformation. They must have known that they were deceiving the people, yet they persisted in presenting these lies and requiring that the ignorant laity believe them. Sometimes the priests induced dying sinners to give vast tracts of lands to abbeys and monasteries, in order to atone for their bad lives. In one way or another, they were continually separating sinners from their money and accumulating property and wealth in the hands of the Roman church.

The power of the priests was practically despotic and was used for every purpose except the advancement of the Christian faith. It seemed that their primary object was power. To them confession had to be made. Without their absolution and extreme unction no professing Christian could be saved. Without their masses no soul could be redeemed from purgatory. In short, they were, to all intents and purposes, the mediators between Christ and man. To please and honor the Roman church was a devout Christian’s first duty. To injure them was the greatest of sins. One of the indulgences issued in 1498, with the authority of the Pope, claimed: “To absolve people from usury, theft, manslaughter, fornication and all crime whatsoever, except smiting the clergy and conspiring against the Pope!”

A starving man in a famine may be reduced to eating rats and rubbish, rather than die of hunger. Similarly, a conscience-stricken soul, deprived of God’s Word, should not be judged too harshly by us, if they struggled to find comfort in the most debasing superstition. However, we must never forget that it was from such superstitions which the Reformation delivered us.

The Reformation delivered the church from blatant immorality Before the Reformation, the lives of the clergy were simply scandalous. There were brothels in the Vatican. The Popes, Cardinals and Bishops openly consorted with prostitutes and engaged in the most debauched orgies. The local priests became notorious for gluttony, drunkenness and gambling. As Bishop Ryle pointed out: “To expect the huge roots of ignorance and superstition, which filled our land, to bear any but corrupt fruit, would be unreasonable and absurd.”

Contemporary art depicted friars as foxes preaching with the neck of a stolen goose peeping out of the hood behind; as wolves giving absolution, with the sheep partly concealed under their cloaks; or as apes sitting on a sick man’s bed with a crucifix in one hand and with the other hand in the suffering person’s pocket! Such public contempt in art reflects the scorn with which the clergy were held at the time.

Bishop Ryle pointed out: “But the blackest spot on the character of our pre-Reformation clergy in England is one of which it is painful to speak … their horrible contempt of the 7th Commandment … the consequences of shutting up herds of men and women in the prime of life, in monasteries and nunneries, were such that I will not defile my paper by dwelling upon them … if ever there was a plausible theory weighed in the balance and found utterly wanting, it is the favorite theory that celibacy and monasticism promote holiness … monasteries and nunneries were frequently sinks of iniquity.”

The report of the Royal Commissioners, under Henry VIII, declared: “That manifest sin, vicious, carnal and abominable living, is daily used and committed in abbeys, priories, and other religious houses of monks, cannons and nuns, and that albeit many continual visitations have been had, by the space of 200 years or more, for an honest and charitable reformation of such unthrifty, carnal and abominable living, yet that nevertheless, little or none amendment was hitherto had, but that their vicious living shamefully increased and augmented.”

It was observed that: “There is no surer recipe for promoting immorality than fullness of bread and abundance of idleness.” (Ezekiel 16:49) It is from such superstition, corruption, immorality, ignorance and idolatry that the Reformation freed the church.

The Reformation gave the church back the Bible In 1519, six men and a woman were burned at Coventry for teaching their children the Ten Commandments, the Lord’s Prayer and the Apostle’s Creed in English. Nothing seems to have alarmed and enraged the Roman priesthood as much as the spread of Bibles in the local language. It was for the crime of translating the Bible into English that the Reformer, William Tyndale, was burned at the stake. Of all the aspects which combined to make up the Reformation, no other aspect received such bitter opposition as the translation and circulation of the Scriptures. The translation of the Bible struck a blow at the root of the whole Roman Catholic system. The Bible, as the only rule of faith and conduct, freely available in the local languages, was a threat to all the superstitions and abuses of the medieval Roman popery. With the Bible in every parish church, every thoughtful man soon saw that the religion of the priests had no basis in Holy Scripture.

The Reformation opened the road to the throne of Grace The way of salvation had become blocked up and made impassible by heaps of superstitious rubble. “He who desired to obtain forgiveness had to seek it through a jungle of priests, saints, Mary worship, masses, penances, confession, absolution and the like, so that there might as well have been no throne of Grace at all.” J.C. Ryle

The Reformers hacked their way through this huge jungle of papal obstruction and cleared the way for every heavy-laden sinner to go straight to the Lord Jesus Christ for remission of sins.

The Reformation restored Biblical simplicity to worship Before the Reformation, the laity were only present at church services as passive, ignorant spectators. The elaborate, theatrical presentations of the sacraments were a solemn farce because the ceremonies and prayers were in Latin. The laity could bring their bodies to the services, but their minds, understanding, reason and spirit could take no part at all. For this reason, the 24th Article of the Church of England declared: “It is a thing totally repugnant to the Word of God and the custom of the primitive church to have public prayer in the church or to minister the sacraments in a tongue not understood of the people.”

The Reformation gave a Biblical understanding of the office of a minister Before the Reformation, the concept of the Christian ministry was sacerdotal. That is – it was understood that every clergyman was a sacrificing priest. The clergy were understood to hold the keys of Heaven and to be practically the mediators between God and man.

The Reformers brought the office of the clergy down to its Scriptural level. They stripped it entirely of any sacerdotal character. They cast out the words “sacrifice” and “altar”. They taught that the clergy were pastors, ambassadors, messengers, witnesses, evangelists, teachers and ministers of the Word and sacraments. The Reformers taught that the chief business of every Christian minister is to preach the Word and to be diligent in prayer and the reading of the Scriptures. The Reformers taught the immense superiority of the pulpit to the confessional. For this reason, where the altar used to be, the Lord’s table was placed with an open Bible, or a pulpit, showing the centrality of God’s Word in the worship of Protestant churches.

The Reformation restored a Biblical understanding of holiness Before the Reformation, it was believed that a monastic life and vows of celibacy were the only ways to escape sin and to attain sanctification. Multitudes of men and women poured into the monasteries and convents under the vain idea that this would please God and ensure their eternal salvation.

The Reformers struck at the root of this fallacy by establishing the great Scriptural principle that true religion was not to be found in retiring into convents and monasteries and fleeing from the difficulties of daily life, but in manfully facing up to our difficulties and doing our duty diligently - in every position to which God calls us. It is not by running away from the world, that we fulfill God’s call, but by courageously resisting the devil, the flesh and the world and overcoming them in daily life. That is how true holiness is to be exhibited. For this reason, the Reformers dissolved the monasteries and convents in their areas and freed the inmates to be reintegrated into normal life.

The Reformers also ordered that the Ten Commandments be set up in every parish church and taught to every child, and that our duty towards God and our neighbor be set forth in the Catechism. They insisted that you cannot become saints by shirking your duties in society.

A Heritage of Faith and Freedom We must continually thank God for the Reformation. It lit the flames of knowledge and freedom which we must ensure are never allowed to be extinguished or to grow dim. We need to continually remember that the Reformation was won for us by the blood of many tens of thousands of martyrs. It was not only by their preaching and praying, and writing and legislation, but by their sacrifices that our religious liberty, freedom of conscience and Christian heritage was won.

The Reformation found church members steeped in ignorance and left them in possession of knowledge. It found them without Bibles and left them with the Bible in every parish. It found them in darkness and left them in light. It found them bound in fear and left them enjoying the liberty and peace which only Christ can give. It found them strangers to the blood of Christ’s atonement, to faith, grace and holiness and left them with the key of all those blessings in their hands. It found them blind and left them with spiritual eyes to see. It found them slaves to superstition and set them free to serve Christ.

As Bishop Ryle declared: “Are we to return to a church which boasts that she is infallible and never changes – to a church which has never repented her pre-Reformation superstitions and abominations – to a church which has never confessed and abjured her countless corruptions? Are we to go back to gross ignorance of true religion? Shame on us, I say, if we entertain the idea for a moment! Let the Israelite return to Egypt, if he will. Let the prodigal go back to his husks among the swine. Let the dog return to his vomit. But let no Englishman with brains in his head, ever listen to the idea of exchanging Protestantism for Popery, or returning to the bondage of the church of Rome. No, indeed! … God forbid! The man who counsels such base apostasy and suicidal folly, must be judicially blind. The iron collar has been broken; let us not put it on again. The prison has been thrown open; let us not resume the yoke and return to our chains … Let us not go back to ignorance, superstition, priestcraft and immorality.”

If you have a Bible in your own language, and enjoy to read and study God’s Word, never forget that you owe that Bible to the Reformation. Brave men and women died that you could have the freedom to delight in God’s Word.

If you know the joy of sins forgiven and new life in Christ, if you are walking by faith and enjoying peace with God, never forget that you owe this priceless privilege to the Reformation.

If you enjoy Church services, Scripture choruses, Hymns, prayers and sermons in your own language, remember that for this you are also indebted to the Reformation.

If you appreciate the Biblical and practical sermons of your pastor, and his counsel, never forget that for this you are indebted to the Reformation. The Reformation is the source of many blessings. We need to ask if we are on the side of the Reformers, or of those who burned them and the Bible. “… Contend earnestly for the Faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.” Jude 3


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: catholicbashing; reformation; revisionisthistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 2,701-2,713 next last
To: Natural Law
Another mythical doctrine dreamed up by the anti-Catholics.

#1 - I am NOT anti-Catholics.

#2 - It was certainly a doctrine at one time that unbaptized babies went to a place called Limbo. That the Catholic Church now says words to the effect of "We don't really know what happens to unbaptized babies - but we hope they will go to be with God" is still saying, in effect, unbaptized babies do not go to Heavan. Do you deny that it was once taught that they went to Limbo?

1,121 posted on 02/07/2011 11:01:35 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I didn’t mean the woman of today Cronos. Who have many freedoms that were not given in Biblical times.

But thanks to Jesus....and as it is written when you read further in those references....”Be ye submissive one to the other” of which ment both husband and wife. Jesus brought equality back to women which they lost in the garden...as Genisis records....”and your desire will be to your husband and he shall ‘rule’ over you.”

Jesus set woman free.


1,122 posted on 02/07/2011 11:05:42 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: caww
Valid -about a comparison between then and now, - but note my point --> if one says one's group follows the NT completely, then why not follow this? 1 Tim 2:11 11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full
1,123 posted on 02/07/2011 11:41:02 PM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1122 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I think woman can and do just that...but they choose to do that..and that is the difference Cronos. Choice and the freedom of doing or do not.

Perhaps best you explain what submissive and quitness is in your mind.


1,124 posted on 02/07/2011 11:53:33 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies]

To: caww
do note that you said Might do well to study up on Middle Eastern woman compared to Western woman...thus you would understand the verses you have posted.

This was implying the present day sense, but never mind, also, do note that this is from Paul's letter to Timothy who was in Ephesus in the 1st century AD

Ephesus is in what is now Turkey -- at that time it was a melting pot of various cultures -- mostly Greek, but also Lydian and other Anatolian cultures and also Semitic.

Greek women's status in society was while not en par with men, was quite high -- women could read and write and play musical instruments (possibly the women were more literate as they were in charge of the house and the men went out to do the hard labor).

Please can you tell me where Jesus said: ”Be ye submissive one to the other” -- I can't recall the exact statement by Jesus, it clouds with 1 Peter and epistles by Paul.

In any case, Paul wrote this -- does any group follow this completely? If any group says it follows the NT completely and does not follow these lines, then they are not following the NT completely
1,125 posted on 02/07/2011 11:53:42 PM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1122 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Smvoice -- at the outset, apologies for the outburst. It is frustrating when someone picks a random verse out of context and it's meaning in the chapter is completely different.

Now, to the point, what does 1 Cor 1 say
[10] Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no schisms among you; but that you be perfect in the same mind, and in the same judgment.

[11] For it hath been signified unto me, my brethren, of you, by them that are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

[12] Now this I say, that every one of you saith: I indeed am of Paul; and I am of Apollo; and I am of Cephas; and I of Christ.

[13] Is Christ divided? Was Paul then crucified for you? or were you baptized in the name of Paul?

[14] I give God thanks, that I baptized none of you but Crispus and Caius;

[15] Lest any should say that you were baptized in my name.

[16] And I baptized also the household of Stephanus; besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

[17] For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of speech, lest the cross of Christ should be made void.
The context, the chapter is dealing with how Paul says, don't say " I indeed am of Paul; and I am of Apollo; and I am of Cephas", i.e. don't go around saying "I follow Calvin" or "I follow Arminius" etc.

He asked "Is Christ divided?"

Paul then points out that he baptised only Crispus and Caius and the household of Stephanus and the others in Corinth were baptised by others -- but it doesn't matter, as he says, all were baptised in the name of Jesus Christ and all should think of themselves as part of the ONE Church.

This entire chapter is on Paul emphasising that unity is important and not to go around saying "Oh, I was baptised by Paul" and someone else saying "oh, I was baptised by Peter".

This has nothing whatsoever to do with your statement as this being a baptism versus preaching.
1,126 posted on 02/08/2011 12:01:18 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: boatbums; CynicalBear; wmfights; roamer_1; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; HarleyD
How is this any different from the RC doctrine that unbaptized babies did not go to Heaven?

Christians can be reasonably assured of their children's salvation because it is God who gave them their children in the first place.

The RCC wrongly believes it is the Vatican imprimatur that saves the child in baptism when Scripture tells us it is grace that saves and grace alone.

The Jews didn't question God's call for circumcision. Why should we refuse to acknowledge the circumcision of the heart, as God both commands and performs?

1,127 posted on 02/08/2011 12:04:02 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Lera:
Man sets the tone for his house . If the tone in his house is bad he had better start asking himself what he is doing that the tone in his house is bad.

MarkBsnr:
That is correct. I find that women despise men that they can dominate.


It goes both ways. Wives can not be happy with men that try to dominate and control them.

If you treat a wife like property she will feel like a slave and seek freedom. If you love and cherish her she will do the same to you. Happy couples walk side by side helping each other along the way. They become best friends if they didn’t start out that way. If you want to receive you had better give (I am not talking about money or things you can buy with it )

Psalms 31 describes the perfect wife. She is G-d fearing and loves her husband and her family much . If you read it you’ll notice she is quite independent and not controlled or micromanaged ... her husband is very loving and cherishes her.

I’m going to repeat this because this is the secret to a happy marriage.
Man sets the tone for his house . If the tone in his house is bad he had better start asking himself what he is doing or (or not doing) that the tone in his house is bad.

Pedestals are for plants


1,128 posted on 02/08/2011 12:05:29 AM PST by Lera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Amen. They have Peter’s own words that tell us the rock is Jesus Christ, words that clearly deny Rome’s doctrine, and yet they still refuse to see it.


1,129 posted on 02/08/2011 12:06:17 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: metmom; boatbums; RnMomof7

Rome is a true misogynist, made up of a bunch of guys who spurn a wife and family, who prefer the company of other men, and who believe themselves to be “another Christ.”

Decay.


1,130 posted on 02/08/2011 12:10:24 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1095 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Smvoice: The GOSPEL that the 12 were sent to preach INCLUDED BAPTISM for remission of sins. The Gospel of the Kingdom

I'm gratified that you believe that in the Gospel baptism is for remission of sins.

If Paul did not preach and perform baptism for the remission of sins, --> this is a false statement as Paul himself says in 1 Cor 1:14 "[14] I give God thanks, that I baptized none of you but Crispus and Caius; " and 16 "[16] And I baptized also the household of Stephanus"

Paul DID baptise and Paul did preach that baptism is for remission of sins, and here is what Paul said Acts 2:38,
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Acts 22:16;
16 And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.
Rom. 6:1–4;
1 What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? 2 By no means! We are those who have died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? 3 Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.
1 Cor 6:11,
11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God
1 Cor 12:13;
13 For we were all baptized by[a] one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.
Gal. 3:26–27;
26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ
Eph. 5:26;
to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word,
Col. 2:11–12;
11 In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh[a] was put off when you were circumcised by[b] Christ,
12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.
Titus 3:5;
5 he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit,
One cannot even say this was a symbol -- look at all of the examples above, look at the language, consistently same the same in each, that in baptism we are saved and buried with Christ, washed of our sins by this and born again
1,131 posted on 02/08/2011 12:15:54 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Smvoice: The GOSPEL that the 12 were sent to preach INCLUDED BAPTISM for remission of sins. The Gospel of the Kingdom

I'm gratified that you believe that in the Gospel baptism is for remission of sins.

If Paul did not preach and perform baptism for the remission of sins, --> this is a false statement as Paul himself says in 1 Cor 1:14 "[14] I give God thanks, that I baptized none of you but Crispus and Caius; " and 16 "[16] And I baptized also the household of Stephanus"

Paul DID baptise and Paul did preach that baptism is for remission of sins, and here is what Paul said Acts 2:38,
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Acts 22:16;
16 And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.
Rom. 6:1–4;
1 What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? 2 By no means! We are those who have died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? 3 Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.
1 Cor 6:11,
11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God
1 Cor 12:13;
13 For we were all baptized by[a] one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.
Gal. 3:26–27;
26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ
Eph. 5:26;
to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word,
Col. 2:11–12;
11 In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh[a] was put off when you were circumcised by[b] Christ,
12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.
Titus 3:5;
5 he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit,
One cannot even say this was a symbol -- look at all of the examples above, look at the language, consistently same the same in each, that in baptism we are saved and buried with Christ, washed of our sins by this and born again
1,132 posted on 02/08/2011 12:16:22 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
1 Cor 1:18-22 says
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
19 For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.”[c]
20 Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?
21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.
22 Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom,
23 but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles,
Firstly, this does point out that we are in the process of salvation, secondly, it points out that we preach Christ crucified.

Thirdly it does not say that preaching is the ONLY way -- where exactly do you read that in "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness: but unto us which are saved, it is the power of God."?? huh?
1,133 posted on 02/08/2011 12:22:26 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Now Romans 1:16, reads as
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile.
This clearly states that the power of God brings salvation to everyone -- it does not talk of the method.

The problem is that you guys read in excerpts -- read in context. in context it is clear, Romans 6:4 reiterates 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.
1,134 posted on 02/08/2011 12:24:50 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; CynicalBear
The infant doesn't even have to believe.

That's because it isn't faith that saves, but grace.

In adults, God uses true faith in Jesus Christ as the conduit for His gift of grace.

But that Scriptural pattern doesn't preclude infants receiving that same grace. We know from John the Baptist that even infants can receive the grace of God and be saved.

1,135 posted on 02/08/2011 12:26:47 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Quix: They haven’t approached 10% of my candor about Pentecostalism.

What CANDOR? I asked you once about Benny Hinn and all you said was that he was a strange fish. Nothing else

And, I've not read any one of your posts with ANY sort of "candor" about Pentecostalism -- can you name one?

You say that you consider our condemnation of those among us who stray as " easy, glib, shallow." --> yet, none of us see any condemnations from you on Pentecostalist who do stray -- not even "easy, glib, shallow" statements.
1,136 posted on 02/08/2011 12:28:32 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; CynicalBear
No, no, no a thousand times no. You must believe The Gospel to be saved.

Then logically it would follow that you believe all infants who die before they come to faith are not saved. Right?

1,137 posted on 02/08/2011 12:29:49 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1086 | View Replies]

To: Quix

to 788 —> and what acknowledgements have you made, “Acknowledgements personally and candidly?” that you demand from us? I repeat, where is the “10% candor of pentecostalists” that you claim? I have heard nothing from you against Hinn besides that he is a strange fish, nary a word against some of the Prosperity Gospel excesses, nothing. And what is it that you demand from us?


1,138 posted on 02/08/2011 12:32:15 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; CynicalBear; wmfights

1 Corinthians 7:12-15 contradicts the opinion that the children of believers are not holy.


1,139 posted on 02/08/2011 12:32:48 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1075 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Who told you that? have you read the Catechism? This is what it says
In the epiclesis, the Church asks the Father to send his Holy Spirit (or the power of his blessing180) on the bread and wine, so that by his power they may become the body and blood of Jesus Christ and so that those who take part in the Eucharist may be one body and one spirit (some liturgical traditions put the epiclesis after the anamnesis).

1,140 posted on 02/08/2011 12:33:13 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 2,701-2,713 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson