Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; MarkBsnr; kosta50; D-fendr; stfassisi
"In my heart, I believe the orthodox were the seedbed for the unaffiliated, non-latin churches, and consequently, the source of willingness to disagree. And that led to the reformation."

Now there's a theory I have never heard before. I find it hard to believe, Padre, that the Reformers of the 16th century were taking their inspiration from the Patriarchates of the East. Certainly some of the generation after Luther tired to connect with Orthodoxy, but it came to nothing and I can't see where an unaffiliated ecclesiology can be found anywhere in the history of The Church in the East. The one place that one might be able to find Orthodoxy in the Reformation in the West is England where arguably there was at least some consciousness of a pre-Roman Catholic, "national" particular church which had strong ties not only to Constantinople but also to the monasteries of the Egyptian desert and which was all but destroyed after 664. Are you aware of any histories or writings which indicate among the Reformers an awareness and understanding of the communion and primacy issues which lead to the firming up of the Great Schism between, say, 900 and 1453?

955 posted on 01/29/2011 8:58:39 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]


To: Kolokotronis

Just the fact that dissent existed, my friend, in a world where dissent was disallowed/frowned upon.


992 posted on 01/30/2011 3:10:14 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson