This phase transformation stuff is only hypothesis.
As mentioned earlier, neither reason nor evidence can confirm that the energy conservation law existed infinitely into the past.
Reason cannot confirm it—the law is not self evident. Do you really not understand this concept?
(If you’re getting your information from an apparent physicist recently interviewed on NPR, I would caution you to pay attention to the end of the interview where he admits having another, unrelated agenda.)
No, not hypothesis. It is theory supported by a great deal of evidence.
"As mentioned earlier, neither reason nor evidence can confirm that the energy conservation law existed infinitely into the past.
Reason is sufficient, because there is more than sufficient evidence for the law.
"If you’re getting your information from an apparent physicist...
I do my own physics.
"Reason cannot confirm it—the law... Do you really not understand this concept?
I understand it just fine. In order for your assertion to mean any more than nothing, you must show that energy can be created, or destroyed.