Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr; kosta50
"Or are you saying that one cannot accept the first cause argument and one's religious beliefs simultaneously?"

Exactly. More specifically, I see incompatibility of the First Cause argument with all known religions today: 'Changeless' clashes with 'timeless' - doctrinal specifics that clash with one-another, or exist in parallel in other faiths, again contradicting uniqueness.

1,188 posted on 02/07/2011 3:31:10 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett
Thanks for your reply:

I see incompatibility of the First Cause argument with all known religions today…

Got it. I don't agree, but that's a different discussion. I enjoy comparative religion, so maybe we'll have a go sometime.

exist in parallel in other faiths, again contradicting uniqueness.

This will bother some, but I don't see it as a deal killer. That religions agree mostly on the attributes of the divine is corroboration to me. There is still plenty enough uniqueness to argue about. :)

1,189 posted on 02/07/2011 3:42:30 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson