Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
Sorry, reformatting for clarity:

would be a timeless entity

More precisely: eternal.

What that entails is that all of that "first cause" happened in an instant that took no time.

This premise neglects the definition of eternal as outside time. In this definition of eternal, "instant," "time," "no time," "some time," etc. are nonsensical.

1,174 posted on 02/07/2011 11:43:51 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr; kosta50
More precisely: eternal.

Eternal means forever, and again implies time. In your hypothetical realm that was created to accommodate the deity which has no time to speak of, eternity is equally meaningless - no difference between a nanosecond and a trillion years.

As 'time' itself wouldn't apply, change cannot happen without time, and therefore, nothing that the deity did would / should take any time, implying that everything that it did, it did in an instant, and not over a course of days: "On the first day... rested (a time-based non-action) on the seventh day," etc.

1,175 posted on 02/07/2011 11:59:01 AM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson