Skip to comments.
Mohler takes on 'theistic evolution'
Associated Baptist Press ^
| January 13, 2011
| Bob Allen
Posted on 01/16/2011 4:09:10 PM PST by balch3
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,721-1,733 next last
To: CynicalBear
But it says in Genesis 1:2 that the earth was without form and void. If that was the first thing He did it doesnt sound like that was very good. What does it say happened next?
101
posted on
01/16/2011 8:30:37 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: Ira_Louvin
You are incorrect the Evolutionary theory does not address the origin of life. Why not?
Doesn't that seem bizarre to you?
Scientific theories of one type or another address everything from A to Z, but we hear repeatedly that science does not address what is arguably the most important question posed by mankind. Why the gap? Why the one question that's off-limits?
102
posted on
01/16/2011 8:34:57 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: stormer
There’s a forum called Democratic Underground. It’s chock full of leftists, progressives, atheists, evolutionists, etc. Perhaps you would feel more at home there.
103
posted on
01/16/2011 8:36:07 PM PST
by
balch3
To: Mr. Silverback
biopoesis is the study of how life on Earth arose from inanimate matter
different theory.
104
posted on
01/16/2011 8:36:39 PM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(Palin '12 begins in '11. In western New Hampshire pour moi.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
I think you'll have something of a wait. But I can feel my face drop as I think of my asshole cell biology professor - happily, I cannot recall his name. Nothing quite like trying to conjure up Kreb's Cycle during a mid-term as he helpfully reminds the class there are only 5 minutes left...
105
posted on
01/16/2011 8:38:29 PM PST
by
stormer
To: reasonisfaith
Your FReeper page indicates that you’re a Christian. Does it bother you that your Lord is descended from a fictional character?
106
posted on
01/16/2011 8:39:16 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: GourmetDan
[What we do see is that evolutionary believers ]
We? Maybe that's what you see.
Meanwhile the image you project, regardless of c, is that of an arrogant religionist twit who jumps to conclusions about the faith of others in the process of pompously assuming dominion over it.
107
posted on
01/16/2011 8:40:39 PM PST
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: Mr. Silverback
>>What does it say happened next?<<
He started re-creating and reforming the world that then was that had been destroyed.
To: balch3
They don’t like me there, either. Good thing I’m not thin-skinned.
109
posted on
01/16/2011 8:43:40 PM PST
by
stormer
To: balch3; Alamo-Girl; alstewartfan; betty boop; Blogger; Blood of Tyrants; BrandtMichaels; cheee; ...
To: Goldsborough
>> “Giants do not exist.” <<
.
Anynore.
To: Grunthor
To: Mr. Silverback
I’m not sure where spontaneous generation fits in a discussion of evolutionary theory, but I wonder how he would have felt about parthenogenesis in humans?
113
posted on
01/16/2011 8:49:34 PM PST
by
stormer
To: stormer
Good examples, but creation is the only science on this issue. Naturalism disregards all the evidence.
To: stormer
exquisite theory, Dr. Kreb.
I don’t like plants.
115
posted on
01/16/2011 8:51:08 PM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(Palin '12 begins in '11. In western New Hampshire pour moi.)
To: stormer
Puzzlingly irrelevant. Not so. Answer the question, please.
116
posted on
01/16/2011 8:51:35 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: Mr. Silverback
Yes I am, but I understand the difference between Science and Religion
117
posted on
01/16/2011 8:51:35 PM PST
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: James C. Bennett
>> “What does the Second Law of Thermodynamics have to do with your assertion that ‘life cannot come from non-life’?” <<
.
The second law prohibits an increase in order. Logic also prohibits such for those with higher cognition, but for the back slope of the curve, hope springs eternal.
.
To: editor-surveyor
Some are still around...
119
posted on
01/16/2011 8:57:50 PM PST
by
stormer
To: campaignPete R-CT
OK, let’s say that’s true.
Does it reflect well on eveolutionists that they play such word games? When someone says “Eveolution doesn’t address the origins of life” they know the listener is going to assume that means that modern biology doesn’t address it, and will never be aware there is another branch of theory.
Sounds like the word games Democrats play.
120
posted on
01/16/2011 8:57:52 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,721-1,733 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson