To: Cronos; MarkBsnr; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; ...
I would also note . . . that in terms of solid statistical results, the sample size is not near as important as whether the sample is REPRESENTATIVE of the population in terms of all the variables being measured and in terms of holding all the other variables equal or random.
2,625 posted on
02/01/2011 9:11:49 PM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Quix
I would also note . . . that in terms of solid statistical results, the sample size is not near as important as whether the sample is REPRESENTATIVE of the population in terms of all the variables being measured and in terms of holding all the other variables equal or random. Yes, yes. And how are you going to indicate how representative of 1.2 billion plus people across the world a sample in some hollow of the United States would be. I would advise my Protestant friends to untuck their heads from their navels and consider that the world is not the county of the United States that they grew up in.
2,830 posted on
02/02/2011 8:28:34 AM PST by
MarkBsnr
(I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson