If you are trying for the record for the most errors in a single post you are getting close.
1) The Vatican and Rome are two completely different entities.
2) The pope is selected by the Holy Spirit through Apostolic Succession. I don't expect you to admit it because doing so would reveal the vacuousness of your entire Calvinist dogma.
2) Papal Infallibility is not a carte blanche and has only been exercised twice. To present it as anything else is completely disingenuous.
4) The Church does recognize the Letters of Paul as both inspired and infallible, but not your interpretations of them. The interpretation is valid ONLY when it supports and affirms the Gospels. Any other interpretation is false, heretical and possibly blasphemous.
Christ never taught apostolic succession, He never told the apostles they could select replacements or pass on any of the gifts that were for the foundation of the church...apostolic succession doctrine is made of whole cloth..
2) Papal Infallibility is not a carte blanche and has only been exercised twice. To present it as anything else is completely disingenuous.
That is twice more than the Scriptures permit
4) The Church does recognize the Letters of Paul as both inspired and infallible, but not your interpretations of them. The interpretation is valid ONLY when it supports and affirms the Gospels. Any other interpretation is false, heretical and possibly blasphemous.
How interesting that the Roman church teaches Paul is inspired, but only the parts we like that support our doctrine..