To: Mad Dawg; Natural Law
I'm not well versed in all this, but my impression, FWIW, is that Unam Sanctam is one of the strongest pieces of evidence for Old Reggie's view that no teaching cannot be refined into something almost its opposite, or whatever OR says. On the contrary I believe THERE IS NO CATHOLIC TEACHING WHICH IS SO CLEAR IT CANNOT BE DENIED, MODIFIED, OR REINTERPRETED AS REQUIRED!
5,232 posted on
09/15/2010 3:06:31 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
For comparison, to see what is the ideal: what is the clear consistent UU teaching throughout the ages on Jesus Christ?
5,233 posted on
09/15/2010 3:11:10 PM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: OLD REGGIE
"THERE IS NO CATHOLIC TEACHING WHICH IS SO CLEAR IT CANNOT BE DENIED, MODIFIED, OR REINTERPRETED AS REQUIRED!"....BY THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO REMAIN IGNORANT OF THE FACTS AND HAVE A MOTIVE TO DAMAGE THE CHURCH.
5,248 posted on
09/15/2010 3:53:24 PM PDT by
Natural Law
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson