Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Enough what? You mean they are satisfed?

Just the opposite.

4,962 posted on 09/15/2010 12:11:12 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4961 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

You’re being too cryptic. And it’s late. Could you just answer all at once? I didn’t understand what you’re saying one of the twins doesn’t have enough of.


4,970 posted on 09/15/2010 12:25:41 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4962 | View Replies ]

To: D-fendr

“However, other Arminians have chosen a different line of argumentation against the classical Calvinistic understanding. They posit that the election of Ephesians 1:3-4 concerns the election of a corporate body of believers in Christ. It is not an election of the individual, but rather a choice of a body that all those who will trust in Jesus Christ for salvation can be a part of. With this view, Christ is presented as the foundation of the election of the church in Ephesians 1:3-4, and as the object election in 1 Peter 2:6. As the church is the body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:27), Christ’s election includes the election of his body. Thus, there is a strong connection between the election of the church and Christ’s election.”

http://evangelicalarminians.org/files/Ratliff.%20Ephesians%201.3-4.%20An%20Explanation%20of%20the%20Corporate%20and%20Christcentric%20Nature%20of%20Election.pdf


5,019 posted on 09/15/2010 7:47:10 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4962 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson