Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg

The Protestant Reformation really did involve a very few “denominations.” Those were the reformed and the lutheran and the presbyterians.

The Anglicans sort of got involved, but not for reformationist reasons. They broke away because of kings and personal politics driving kings.

Non-protestant groups today would definitely include: all charismatic and pentecostal groups, Mormons, many baptistic groups, the orthodox of all stripes, all restorationist groups, and the “lets-hang-out-a-shingle” groups with weird names.

I’m not trying to be argumentative. It’s just that the protestant reformation actually meant something about its relationship to breaking away from the Catholic Church.


326 posted on 07/24/2010 4:28:40 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I’m not trying to be argumentative. It’s just that the protestant reformation actually meant something about its relationship to breaking away from the Catholic Church.

Neither did I take it as argumentative.

That's pretty much my understanding, always provided that the C of E really did go through a strongly Calvinist phase during Edward VI's reign/regency, and has had a strongly Calvinist wing ever since.

But with respect to a Caucus, "Non-Protestant" would be a remarkably diverse group, with Catholic and all charismatic and pentecostal groups, Mormons, many baptistic groups, the orthodox of all stripes, all restorationist groups, and the “lets-hang-out-a-shingle” groups with weird names. !!!

That would be SOME party!

330 posted on 07/24/2010 5:55:06 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; Mad Dawg
Those were the reformed and the lutheran and the presbyterians.

Not really. You mean the Lutherans, the Calvinists and those following Zwingli, but there were also others, the Unitarians and others just popped up like Anabaptists, etc. Even the Marburg Colloquy (1529) didn't resolve any of these differences.

You're

And you are right about the pent-e-costals, Mormons, BAptists, etc. but I would argue that they are second or third generation PRotestants in that they did not originally break from the Catholic Church but broke from those that broke from the CAtholic Church, hence they fall under the umbrella of child or grand-child divisions of the Protestant groups
348 posted on 07/24/2010 11:59:38 PM PDT by Cronos (Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson