When they deny something as clear and explicit as "one God and one mediator between God and men," you have to wonder about their entire reasoning ability.
If they get that wrong, how can anything that follows this misdirection not be tinged with error?
When they deny something as clear and explicit as “one God and one mediator between God and men,” you have to wonder about their entire reasoning ability.
If they get that wrong, how can anything that follows this misdirection not be tinged with error?
INDEED.
Though it think instead of “tinged” I’d have put
“polluted and/or saturated”