Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut; ArrogantBustard

IMO, the term “offense” and all of its psuedonyms is purely relative. It’s an emotional response to a comment, not a rational or analytical one.

It’s all in how the receiver perceives the message and the messenger.

There will be those who read something seeking to find offense instead of reading to gain knowledge. And there are those who enter into the fray with preconceived notions about the intentions or motives of the poster based on posting history or reputation. Some are well deserved, but it can be used to taint others who give the appearance of or directly support the claim/information of the poster.

No benefit of the doubt is given to the poster, they’re considered a “hater, bigot, lout, etc., etc” because they’ve posted something contrary to what the receiver expects or is accustomed to.

I don’t believe there is any “safe” ground or position from which to posit or opine.

Someone is going to find a way to be “offended”.


311 posted on 07/06/2010 1:25:32 PM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian

Someone is going to find a way to be “offended”.

- - - - -
Very true, SZ.


350 posted on 07/06/2010 2:11:42 PM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson