You still have not defended ‘the text’ written by those of your own community of authors... rather, you are avoiding doing so with the diversion common to those who have not an opinion let alone facts to defend their position. Since you have opted not to defend the text, which is quite clear, one then is lead to perhaps believe you do not agree with the text....which is understandable.
If I remain silent on the topic, then the ONLY conclusion you can logically come to is that YOU DO NOT KNOW what I think on that topic.
You do not get to compel me to answer even a polite question, let alone a bunch of (rhetorically) hostile spam, nor do you get to dictate what I think.
You just don't have that power.