To: D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg
"If Free Will was demonstrated to be true, would you accept it?" What and exquisite conundrum. In the absence of freewill she has no authority or ability to accept it. If she either willfully accepts or rejects it she affirms it.
988 posted on
07/15/2010 8:52:25 PM PDT by
Natural Law
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: Natural Law
990 posted on
07/15/2010 8:56:43 PM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Natural Law; D-fendr; HarleyD; the_conscience; wmfights; blue-duncan; RnMomof7
What and exquisite conundrum. In the absence of freewill she has no authority or ability to accept it. If she either willfully accepts or rejects it she affirms it.Lol. The "conundrum" belongs to d-fendr. He boasted he could prove free will existed. Perhaps you missed my acceptance of his challenge.
But d-fendr has yet to show us his evidence. Nada.
What do you get when two RC apologists meet? A lot of pats on the back and not much else.
Unless you can prove free will exists, as you assured us, d-dendr, your failure to support your assertion will stand.
As God wills.
1,210 posted on
07/19/2010 4:09:12 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson