Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Whether reply or respond is a bagatelle, respond will do if it makes you happy. But there truly is no justification for trying to turn “ego eimi” into a title or name in this Scripture. None. Zero.
509 posted on 07/12/2010 1:08:52 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change; Alamo-Girl

We have shown you verse after verse that is justification. If there were “no” justification, we wouldn’t be proposing it. We’re both honest people without an agenda. We have been taught a literate, word-by-word approach to translation, and we’ve gone word-by-word. “Egw Eimi” means “I am”. That is a 1st person singular verb of being with an emphatic 1st person singular pronoun.

“It is I” on the other hand would be something with “eivai”.
You need a third person singular verb of being to arrive at “it is” and I believe that’s “eivai”


510 posted on 07/12/2010 1:34:10 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson