Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law; D-fendr; HarleyD; the_conscience; wmfights; blue-duncan; RnMomof7
What and exquisite conundrum. In the absence of freewill she has no authority or ability to accept it. If she either willfully accepts or rejects it she affirms it.

Lol. The "conundrum" belongs to d-fendr. He boasted he could prove free will existed. Perhaps you missed my acceptance of his challenge.

But d-fendr has yet to show us his evidence. Nada.

What do you get when two RC apologists meet? A lot of pats on the back and not much else.

Unless you can prove free will exists, as you assured us, d-dendr, your failure to support your assertion will stand.

As God wills.

1,210 posted on 07/19/2010 4:09:12 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law

Challenge? Naw, it was a question. Now, It’s kind of a moot exercise for you.

Because you’ve already said that even if Free Will was demonstrated to be true, you would not accept it. Proof doesn’t matter you said - as you demonstrated your free will to accept or reject it.

Anyway, it’s your decision, I’m fine with it. And I appreciate your demonstration.


1,211 posted on 07/19/2010 4:15:09 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson