Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg
No. that assumes the preachers were capable and desirous of knowing what the Vatican said.

1) The Catholic church has never taught the bible in a direct systematic verse by verse chapter by chapter way ..there is NO official Commentary on scripture other than the ones they need to prove their doctrine..so maybe a hundred verses or so ..thats it..

2)If the catholic priests, catholic teachers and catholic theologians have no interest in the teachings of the magistrum I would say they are their own popes and the Vatican is useless ...and so Catholics will never know what the official position of scripture the church holds

2,557 posted on 05/10/2010 11:06:27 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2553 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7; MarkBsnr
To (1) So the ground shifts. Hermeneutic is a word of too much imprecision to mean a verse by verse commentary. Therefor this objection is invalid because I was talking about hermeneutics, not verse by verse commentaries.

To (2) I did not say NO priests, teachers of theologians had the ability or desire to follow the Magisterium.

What prompted this little eddy in the stream was

I heard some terrible hermeneutics in my days as a catholic . And so have I. I cringe sometimes.
Neither of you said, and I am confident MarkBsnr did not mean that he had heard NOTHING but terrible hermeneutics.

This little clashing of blades has little substantive to it.

2,559 posted on 05/10/2010 12:16:29 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2557 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson