Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights

I realize it’s a bit of a bow to my own fantasy about Mary.

When I read the bit about her and Elizabeth, they just sound like two very devoted motherly types.

And, I think I had my own speculations and fantasies about aborted babies being matured and taught the ways of God in Heaven before I ever heard Heavenly Visitation narratives about such.

So, it kind of made a rosey fantasy in my own mind that the Visitation narratives sort of put a convincing cap on . . . for me.

I don’t KNOW that it’s Gospel truth. It IS plausible.

Not anything to build a doctrine on!


117 posted on 04/30/2010 12:23:43 PM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
When I read the bit about her and Elizabeth, they just sound like two very devoted motherly types.

I agree completely. The problem is all the nonsense that gets added on.

Not anything to build a doctrine on!

Exactly!

There is no special role for Mary laid out in Scripture other than as Mother of Jesus. She had no understanding of what was coming, or how Jesus was going to save all believers. She was by all accounts a good mom, concerned about her son, nothing more.

The only reason people bow down to statues of her and pray to her is they are stuck on the wrong side of the cross. They are still caught up in the belief that works and consideration from "special persons" is the key to salvation.

125 posted on 04/30/2010 12:51:07 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson