I can not imagine the police not issuing an arrest warrant had they found any physical evidence to support the allegations of sexual abuse.
As is typical in so many of these cases there is a sizable gap between the alleged incidents and the filing of a civil suit. I could argue for understanding this in those cases where abuse took place in the 60’s and 70’s but in the 1990’s when society was well informed of the danger of child predators? When parents and other care givers were cautioned over and over about the sexual exploitation and abuse of children. Told that it was not just a matter of stranger danger?
I almost hate to say it, but something does not smell right about ths story. And if it does prove to be a credible accusation then a lot of people charged with the protection of these chidren have much to answer for. And that includes their parents.
If something doesn’t smell right about this story, take it up with someone else. We are frequently told that one of the worst problems victims have to face is skepticism from those they ask for help. Maybe you can explain that.
Did you read the article? There are tapes, photographs, etc. And these kids were disabled.