Dr. Eckleburg has asked me three times if I have children, twice after I declined to answer, saying I didn't want to personalize the discussion>
Dr. Eckleburg then implies that if I don't have children, I can only hypothesize, and if I do, that I ought to be protecting them. This line of questioning and intimation is needlessly personal, has nothing to do with my correction of factual error regarding Church documents, and I consider it antagonistic. I'd appreciate it if you'd ask Dr. Eckleburg to stick to the discussion.
Please refer to my post 361. I don’t know why you didn’t answer it.
Why is Dr. Eckleburg allowed to continue personal questions of posters who don’t wish to answer them?