Skip to comments.
No degree for creator of Mormon calendar
Houston Chronicle ^
| March 2, 2009
Posted on 03/03/2009 7:44:26 PM PST by delacoert
Brigham Young University has denied an appeal to award a diploma that the creator of a Mormon beefcake calendar says he earned.
Chad Hardy's diploma was withheld by BYU last fall after he was excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which owns and runs the school. Hardy was excommunicated during the month between completing his courses and graduation ceremonies.
Hardy appealed and met with Dean of Students Vernon L. Heperi on Feb. 13. In the meeting, Heperi sought to determine whether Hardy's life is guided by the school's honor code, which reflects the values of the Mormon church.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
TOPICS: Current Events; Other Christian
KEYWORDS: byu; chadhardy; hardy; lds; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 381-389 next last
To: Elsie
301
posted on
03/07/2009 5:07:35 AM PST
by
JRochelle
(Don't smoke the Hopium.)
To: Religion Moderator
Sorry...I should have said, “It is we that should thank you for showing how false the so-called desire MORMONS have to be part of the Christian community is....thanks again!”
302
posted on
03/07/2009 5:57:51 AM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(buckle in for 4 more years of detached, grandstanding flourish left untethered by an incurious media)
To: delacoert
If you believe that it is alright not to live up to your contracts, I will give your name to some folks who promised to pay me back for a loan and never did.
They need a new mark to steal from.
To: fproy2222
Uh...
Just WHICH part of the ‘contract’ was broken by Chad?
304
posted on
03/07/2009 10:24:09 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
And what part of “gift” do people not understand? When was the last time you had to work for a birthday present?
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. (Eph. 2:8-9)
305
posted on
03/07/2009 11:06:21 AM PST
by
reaganaut
(ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: Birmingham Rain
With respect I ask you, what do I - as a Presbyterian - need other than ... A Bible a Bible we have a Bible...but nothing more.
What am I, as a Christian, lacking in my library to learn of, worship, and love my Lord?
"With respect I ask you"...given your posting history you'll excuse me if I seem a little hesitant in accepting your sincerity. But I don't mind giving my answer...
The desire that you have to learn, worship, and love the Lord is the perfect first step.
In order to truly love God, you have to first have a clear and correct understanding of who He is and what is His purpose. To actually know him, you must know His laws, know His commandments and follow them, His role in the plan of Salvation, His true doctrine, and His true nature.
Modern creeds declare God to be incomprehensible. How can you truly love someone that you don't know and that you can't comprehend. Incomprehensible is, I believe used in an effort to flatter God. But you can't have a "personal" savior that is incomprehensible. God doesn't want flattery, He wants truth, exactness, and correctness.
Unfortunately, the groups of men down through the ages that compiled the list of writings we now call the Bible, in it's many variations; didn't include enough of the writings to give us the whole picture.
We're lucky to even have the book of James. During the reformation, Martin Luther wanted to remove the book of James because it didn't support his accepted doctrine. Martin Luther considered the apostle James to be a heretic.
Can I get what I need from another book? If so, what is its title and what does it teach beyond the New Testament?
Bait....
And what is Modern Christianity by your account? Something newer than the New Testament? I dont understand your comments and am seeking honest answers only, not meaningless or disrespectful replies.
Every religious organization that can trace it roots back to the Council of Nicaea, is a simple of way of stating it. Who created the creeds without any input from God nor did they even claim it and those same man made creeds are taught today in "modern christianty".
306
posted on
03/07/2009 12:20:37 PM PST
by
Stourme
To: Elsie
You know what amaze me is...
I'll take a stab at it...
307
posted on
03/07/2009 12:29:27 PM PST
by
Stourme
To: Stourme
Stourme: In order to truly love God, you have to first have a clear and correct understanding of who He is and what is His purpose. To actually know him, you must know His laws, know His commandments and follow them, His role in the plan of Salvation, His true doctrine, and His true nature.
Dumb Ol Me: Yep. Tru dat. I agree. I get all of that knowing from my Bible. Its all there, Stourme. The Holy Bible ALONE. HIS WORD.
Stourme: Modern creeds declare God to be incomprehensible. How can you truly love someone that you don’t know and that you can’t comprehend. Incomprehensible is, I believe used in an effort to flatter God. But you can’t have a “personal” savior that is incomprehensible. God doesn’t want flattery, He wants truth, exactness, and correctness.
Me: Why can I not have a personal” savior that is incomprehensible? If I were to believe that a person such as myself can save me, why my need for my Savior? Ive got neighbors who are comprehensible, but certainly unable to save my soul. You can truly say that His Mind is known to you? Please, do tell.
Again, Me: Gods love is certainly comprehensible to every Christian. His plan of Salvation is comprehensible; His creation is comprehensible; and certainly, His love for His greatest creation is comprehensible to every Christian. But, do we know His mind? NO. Hmm. Does anywhere in your Bible speak of this? If it were to be so (an all-comprehended God), Hed be reduced to a mere mortal and, by being so all-comprehended by us, then by Whom would you or I be saved? Would that not put me on the same level as God, Himself? I comprehend Gods love for me. I know that Jesus the Christ died for my sins, and that I do not deserve the grace nor the forgiveness, but that through HIM alone I am saved. Not through a mere human’s fancies devised for selfish purposes.
Stourme: Unfortunately, the groups of men down through the ages that compiled the list of writings we now call the Bible, in it’s (sic) many variations; didn’t include enough of the writings to give us the whole picture.
Me, Again: Whats the heavier burden? The leaving off of or the adding to?
My Older Q: Can I get what I need from another book? If so, what is its title and what does it teach beyond the New Testament?
Stourme: Bait....
Moi: Not bait. You, understandably, misunderstood. I meant what books out of the BOM or what learning from the D&C would teach me more about the Son of God, Jesus the Christ, and His love and salvation? What does it have to offer those who are outside of Mormon practice that is based on Christianity?
Stourme: Every religious organization that can trace it roots back to the Council of Nicaea, is a simple of way of stating it. Who created the creeds without any input from God nor did they even claim it and those same man made creeds are taught today in “modern christianty”.
Me Quoting You: Who created the creeds without any input from God NOR DID THEY EVEN CLAIM IT...(emphasis, mine).
Your words, not mine.
Yours Truly: Does Mormonism have any just one, even - man-made creed, Stourme? Cant you find a few?
And, yes, when I say with respect, I actually mean it.
The Truth Shall Set You Free,
BR
308
posted on
03/07/2009 4:51:37 PM PST
by
Birmingham Rain
("Where you tend a rose, my lad, a thistle cannot grow." (The Secret Garden))
To: reaganaut
The word may seem redundant, but it's said (written) with sincerity ... and sometimes the simplest is best: AMEN!
309
posted on
03/07/2009 4:58:42 PM PST
by
Birmingham Rain
("Where you tend a rose, my lad, a thistle cannot grow." (The Secret Garden))
To: Birmingham Rain
Does Mormonism have any just one, even - man-made creed, Stourme? Cant you find a few?
The most obvious answer is the LDS Articles of Faith.
http://scriptures.lds.org/a_of_f/1/1-13#1
although the LDS complain about creeds and JS taught that all creeds were abominations, the AoF is a statement of faith the same as our creeds.
BR, maybe you can tell me...what is so abominable about the following?
Apostles’ Creed
1. I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth:
2. And in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, our Lord:
3. Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary:
4. Suffered under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead and buried: He descended into hell:
5. The third day he rose again from the dead:
6. He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty:
7. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead:
8. I believe in the Holy Ghost:
9. I believe in the holy catholic church: the communion of saints:
10. The forgiveness of sins:
1l. The resurrection of the body:
12. And the life everlasting. Amen.
310
posted on
03/07/2009 5:35:46 PM PST
by
reaganaut
(ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: Birmingham Rain
Good post, BR. I once believe i could completely comprehend God. Now I see that I was being prideful and “puffed up” on my intellect.
How could I fully understand God, every day I grow closer to Him and every day I am more amazed and in awe of Him. To say we can fully comprehend God is to bring Him down to our level.
311
posted on
03/07/2009 5:39:31 PM PST
by
reaganaut
(ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: reaganaut
Thanks for “getting it,” Reaganaut.
Welcome Home,
BR
312
posted on
03/07/2009 6:49:16 PM PST
by
Birmingham Rain
("Where you tend a rose, my lad, a thistle cannot grow." (The Secret Garden))
To: Birmingham Rain
313
posted on
03/07/2009 7:05:43 PM PST
by
reaganaut
(ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: reaganaut
Does Mormonism have any just one, even - man-made creed, Stourme? Cant you find a few? The most obvious answer is the LDS Articles of Faith.
CONSIDER THESE SLIGHTLY MORE ACCURATE ARTICLES OF FAITH
(With enhancements highlighted in red)
- We believe in Joseph Smith. We also believe in God the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost. We believe that these gods were once men, and that you too can become your own god, even though our Prophet, Seer and Revelator denied it on national TV.
- We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, such as murdering or drinking tea, and not for Adam's transgression, unless you were a Negro and died before 1978, in which case you were punished and cursed for the sins of Cain, or for what you did in the pre-existence.
- We believe that through the atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel, especially tithing and the word of wisdom. However, we do not believe that Christ's sacrifice should be discussed on Easter, as this is a more appropriate time to contemplate the martyr of Joseph Smith, our Prophet, Seer & Savior.
- We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in Joseph Smith; second, Faith in the current version of the Book of Mormon; third, Payment of tithing for the remission of sins; fourth, Repentance for not paying tithing (but only if you catch up); fifth, Blind obedience to the current prophet and to your husband, if you are a woman; sixth, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; seventh, Baptism by complete, total, absolute immersion, in the waters, which, by the way, have been cursed, for the remission of sins; eighth, Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Spirit.
- We believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority to collect tithing, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof. We also believe that if any man behaves as if he was not called by God, then it is appropriate to state that the Church is perfect, it is just the people who are flawed.
- We believe in the same organization that existed in the Primitive Church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, moneychangers in the temple, Young Men/Women leaders, Relief Society Presidents, Stake Mission Presidents, Young Single Adults Group Leaders, Elders Quorum Presidents, First Counselor to the President and so forth. We also believe that the primitive name for the church was "Corporation of the President."
- We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy, revelation, visions, faith-healing, interpretation of tongues, tearing out of tongues when you divulge endowment secrets, and so forth.
- We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly (we reserve the right to decide which verses are translated correctly and which are not); we also believe the most recent version of the Book of Mormon to be the word of God. We are currently undecided as to the divine origin of the Book of Abraham, however.
- We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God (which may differ greatly from what He has previously revealed) by means of a comprehensive market survey of members' likes and dislikes.
- We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built upon the American continent or the Middle East; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory. We also believe that our blood may be miraculously changed to that of the Tribe of Ephraim.
- We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience as dictated by the President of the Church, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship however incorrectly, wherever wrongly, or whatever idolatrous beings they may, since Christian clergy are dimwitted hirelings of Satan.
- We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law, unless the law of the land violates the law of God as dictated by the President of the Church, such as in prohibiting the marrying of more than one woman.
- We believe in being honest except when lying for the Lord, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and in doing good to all men; indeed, we may say that we follow the admonition of Paul--We believe all things that the Church President tells us, we hope all things, we have endured many things such as changes in Church teachings and conflicting revelations, and hope to be able to endure all things. If there is any woman virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek to make her obedient, servile, and pregnant.
JOSEPH SMITH
(et al.)
I challenge all Saints to show me where these "slightly more accurate" articles of faith are NOT more truthful than the "official version" expounded by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
314
posted on
03/08/2009 3:09:50 AM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.)
To: Zakeet
315
posted on
03/08/2009 7:30:46 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(buckle in for 4 more years of detached, grandstanding flourish left untethered by an incurious media)
To: Birmingham Rain
Dumb Ol Me: Yep. Tru dat. I agree. I get all of that knowing from my Bible. Its all there, Stourme. The Holy Bible ALONE. HIS WORD.
I hear this from evangelical types all the time. And after careful consideration over the years, I have concluded that this is what I call "loyalty speak". It's a cross between deifying the Bible and trying to show loyalty to God. God = Bible = Only one God.
Mix a large portion of pride, (ie, everything I have has to be right and everything you have is wrong), viola..."The Bible is the only word of God."
The true follower of Christ is humble. A true follower of Christ says to God,
"Please give me all your words that I might study them so that I might correct myself. I welcome any truth from any source that brings me closer to thee."
The modern religionist says to God,
"I will not accept any more of your words. I have chosen which of your words I want and reject all others. You don't have the power to speak any more to me."
The Apostle Paul quoted from pagan poetry because he found truth there. And he quotes that pagan poetry in the Book of Acts. If it was good enough for Paul, why is it not good enough for you? Are you better than Paul?
God has never said the Bible is His only word, only modern religionist do.
...Its all there
Really? How many people have died over the disputes over what's in the Bible? How many people have suffered because they couldn't agree over something as simple as baptism?
These words make soooo much more sense:
2 Nephi 29:6 - 10
6 Thou fool, that shall say: A Bible, we have got a Bible, and we need no more Bible. Have ye obtained a Bible save it were by the Jews?
7 Know ye not that there are more nations than one? Know ye not that I, the Lord your God, have created all men, and that I remember those who are upon the isles of the sea; and that I rule in the heavens above and in the earth beneath; and I bring forth my word unto the children of men, yea, even upon all the nations of the earth?
8 Wherefore murmur ye, because that ye shall receive more of my word? Know ye not that the testimony of two nations is a witness unto you that I am God, that I remember one nation like unto another? Wherefore, I speak the same words unto one nation like unto another. And when the two nations shall run together the testimony of the two nations shall run together also.
9 And I do this that I may prove unto many that I am the same yesterday, today, and forever; and that I speak forth my words according to mine own pleasure. And because that I have spoken one word ye need not suppose that I cannot speak another; for my work is not yet finished; neither shall it be until the end of man, neither from that time henceforth and forever.
10 Wherefore, because that ye have a Bible ye need not suppose that it contains all my words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused more to be written.
The above quote is true and quite honestly it makes sense.
Me: Why can I not have a personal savior that is incomprehensible?
Because the two expressions are diametrically opposed. If your Father in Heaven is incomprehensible to you...then you do not know Him.
Moi: Not bait.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it was a set up for a segue into an anti-Mormon rant.
You, understandably, misunderstood. I meant what books out of the BOM or what learning from the D&C would teach me more about the Son of God, Jesus the Christ, and His love and salvation? What does it have to offer those who are outside of Mormon practice that is based on Christianity?
See.
I'll aim this response at all churches and not at you personally.
1. How can you to love Christ if you refuse to even acknowledge all His commandments. Of course that's why there's a final judgment.
John 14:15
15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
2.Moroni 8:9
9 And after this manner did the Holy Ghost manifest the word of God unto me; wherefore, my beloved son, I know that it is solemn mockery before God, that ye should baptize little children.
3. Where we came from, why we are here, where we are going. 4. By what law all people will be judged. D%C 76. 5. The sacrament. 6. The priesthood. 7. The law of tithing. 8. The true nature of God. 9. Work for the dead. 10. The gift of the Holy Ghost. 11. The difference between salvation and exaltation. 12. etc...
To know the mysteries of God is to know God. And God is not incomprehensible to those who know Him. He is a friend, He is our Holy Father, our guide, He is our God.
You know what is really bizarre to me?
Me Quoting You: Who created the creeds without any input from God NOR DID THEY EVEN CLAIM IT...(emphasis, mine). Your words, not mine.
You don't deny this. Nor will you even acknowledge the significance of it... You won't answer it. It's this gray haze world that evangelicals live in.
When I say modern Christianity is hollow, all I get in return from evangelical types is anti-Mormon rants. Which says to me that I am correct.
316
posted on
03/08/2009 2:52:45 PM PDT
by
Stourme
To: Stourme
It's this gray haze world that evangelicals live in. When I say modern Christianity is hollow, all I get in return from evangelical types is anti-Mormon rants. Which says to me that I am correct.
Ho...hum.....I still don't see any Evangelical Christians whining 'cause they want to be called mormon! Be sure and point me to them if I am wrong.
Below is a sample of the "holloow" rants of mormons...
317
posted on
03/08/2009 3:43:19 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
To: greyfoxx39
It's this gray haze world that evangelicals live in.
When I say modern Christianity is hollow, all I get in return from evangelical types is anti-Mormon rants. Which says to me that I am correct.
Anti-Mormon rants in big fonts mean they really really mean it.
But no matter how big a font they use to hate the Mormons with, greyfoxx39, you still have no answer to my thesis.
318
posted on
03/08/2009 4:47:53 PM PDT
by
Stourme
To: delacoert
Mormon beefcake calendar "I'm so hot I can get six wives!!!"
319
posted on
03/08/2009 4:50:04 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: greyfoxx39
Would you say that someone that teaches false doctrine is going to hell?
320
posted on
03/08/2009 4:51:15 PM PDT
by
Stourme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 381-389 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson