To: Non-Sequitur
Evidence of intelligent design is in you and around you. That's what Darwin supporters say about evolution.
There's no equivalence here. ID has innumerable pieces of evidence while Darwinists have not one shred of evidence of species migrating to another species.
168 posted on
06/14/2008 10:48:28 PM PDT by
Jim W N
To: Jim 0216
not one shred of evidence of species migrating to another species Please see the bacteria referenced earlier in this thread. Evolved a new stomach, that one did. Specifically to metabolize man-made chemicals.
If that does not qualify as evolution then you REALLY need to explain just what you consider evolution!
171 posted on
06/14/2008 10:53:46 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: Jim 0216
ID has innumerable pieces of evidence while Darwinists have not one shred of evidence of species migrating to another species.
You are wrong (as usual).
Fossil Horses FAQs (more information than you'll ever read)
173 posted on
06/14/2008 11:04:56 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Jim 0216
ID has innumerable pieces of evidence while Darwinists have not one shred of evidence of species migrating to another species. That would be incorrect. Science has identified hundreds of fossils which indicate a transition between one class and another. ID, on the other hand, offers no evidence. It tries to discount evolution and then says it must be the only alternative.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson