[Electro]

I know the reason you don’t want to admit that the evolution of life is part of evolutionary theory is because you can’t defend the origination of life from non-living matter. However, that’s what IS part of evolutionary dogma. Nonetheless, if you’re so smart, tell me: How did life come about? Did it evolve out of non-living molecules, or was it created by God?

[Coyoteman]

I know the reason you don’t want to admit that the evolution of life is part of evolutionary theory is because you can’t defend the origination of life from non-living matter. However, that’s what IS part of evolutionary dogma. Nonetheless, if you’re so smart, tell me: How did life come about? Did it evolve out of non-living molecules, or was it created by God?

Doesn't matter if it was one of these, or aliens. The theory of evolution works just fine in any case -- because the theory of evolution does not include origins no matter how many times creationists claim it does!

[PugetSoundSoldier]

The origin of life isn’t part of evolution; it’s a non-issue in the debate about the theory of evolution.

So why don’t you tell me what leads you to believe that evolution defines the origin of life? What reference do you have?

[PugetSoundSoldier]

Oh, and if you really want to know how life arose, see my post 79. It's incontravertible proof, and must be accepted as fact, as the evidence is everywhere and in open view.

You have a different solution to the way life arose? Tell me why yours is better than mine?

[valkyry1]

Great article here on Darwin, his beliefs, and evolutionists.

http://www.thedarwinpapers.com/oldsite/number4/Darwinpapers4.Html