To: maryz
Any besides these? Or are you thinking of the sedevacantists' views of the conciliar Popes?
Honorius was convicted of heresy by a valid Ecumenical Council. If you need the spin doctors bring them on.
4,934 posted on
06/11/2008 3:08:30 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know no thing.)
To: OLD REGGIE
That wasn't settled the last time you brought it up. You can attempt to poison the well pro-actively all you like, but somebody put up a good looking post indicting that it didn't happen the way you say it did.
Further, it was not established that he taught the heresy or just tolerated it.
When that post in rebuttal was put up I saw not response from you. And, no, I'm not going to go look for it.
4,937 posted on
06/11/2008 3:17:20 PM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: OLD REGGIE
The heresy Honorius was a failure to act. No ex cathedra (infallible) act was implicated.
4,938 posted on
06/11/2008 3:18:09 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: OLD REGGIE
Looks pretty doubtful at best to me -- but I realize you're much, much older than I am and no doubt remember A.D. 680 as if it were yesterday! ;-)
4,946 posted on
06/11/2008 3:25:54 PM PDT by
maryz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson