Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
We are stuck in the land of bad analogies. It's what we get in theology. And analogies apply only within their sphere.

Do we call both pilots "Co-pilot". I think that one is the pilot and one the co-pilot. Is that right? If so, which is "senior"? If the "pilot" is "senior", then don't we have a use of "co" which does not imply equality?

I think of the analogy of the relationship between the Father and the Son, which may set your Unitarian teeth on edge. But we say "Eternally begotten of the Father."

Those of us who have done some begetting frequently complain that the actual begetting part was all too momentary. And the usual begetting activity involves starting something up that wasn't there before. (And, BTW, nobody that I know of has any problem with "There was a time when the Theotokos did not exist.")

But still, bearing in mind the not very good reproductive biology of the age, we say the Son is begotten of the Father.

Bad analogy. It's what we got. This is theology, after all, not a crossword puzzle.

487 posted on 06/01/2008 2:32:52 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

It could even be a great analogy in Heaven, and see then face to face, not through a glass, darkly. :D


494 posted on 06/01/2008 2:39:36 PM PDT by Judith Anne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson