Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The thread clearly says, over and over, that Mary is the "co-redemptrix."

Yes it does. Now, let's review my statement:

I hope the record is adequately clear here: None of this involves referring to Mary as "Redemptrix." Claims to the contrary are false.

Did you see the difference?

Do you expect everyone else to ignore the difference?

392 posted on 06/01/2008 1:27:11 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski; 1000 silverlings; Manfred the Wonder Dawg
As 1000S wrote, there is no conjuction "co" in Latin.

Co-redeemers would be equal redeemers. They would share in the work and office of redemption.

Some people may be fooled by this silly wordplay, but not those whom God gives eyes to see.

Let's be clear about this. Do you believe Mary is the "co-redeemer?" Do Mary and Christ both redeem men?

399 posted on 06/01/2008 1:32:07 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson