To: OLD REGGIE
Except that the secondary definition, which you omitted, eviscerates your argument that the phrase can be understood in only one way.
3,055 posted on
06/05/2008 10:54:30 PM PDT by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: Philo-Junius; OLD REGGIE
As we’ve seen from these discussions, the RCC believes a word can mean any number of things depending on the time of day and the turning of the moon.
3,059 posted on
06/05/2008 11:02:22 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Philo-Junius
Except that the secondary definition, which you omitted, eviscerates your argument that the phrase can be understood in only one way.
If I had made such an argument you'd have a case. Since I said no such thing you are tilting at windmills. Your original post gave
one definition; the minor one.
Your motive is suspect.
3,360 posted on
06/06/2008 9:24:01 AM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson