To: netmilsmom
I’m sorry, FRiend, I can’t speak for Cardinal Law. But I can give you this link to a news story talking about the co-redemptrix title. It’s 1997. JPII never did it.
The drip, drip, drip treatment has begun. How many years did they just "talk" about the bodily Assumption.
One day you were allowed to disagree with the idea and then BANG! it was dogma. Believe or be damned.
Prepare yourself.
3,041 posted on
06/05/2008 10:18:10 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: OLD REGGIE
lol. And now even a Cardinal is not to be believed.
So much for that vaunted "apostolic authority."
Only when it suits the current argument. Tomorrow, it may be different.
3,050 posted on
06/05/2008 10:39:23 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: OLD REGGIE
The drip, drip, drip treatment has begun. How many years did they just “talk” about the bodily Assumption.
One day you were allowed to disagree with the idea and then BANG! it was dogma. Believe or be damned.
Prepare yourself.
= = =
INDEED.
3,098 posted on
06/06/2008 4:10:57 AM PDT by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson