[OLD REGGIE]

But if you're saying there is no collaboration among some on your side to make posts designed NOT to tell the truth, to put forward real arguments in a real quest for the truth, but to irritate, I won't believe you.

Name names. I'm feeling left out.

[Mad Dawg]

Well, I won't name names. I may get permission later, but it has to do with keeping confidence and protecting informants.

In the meantime, though, I don't need to. First, I am not talking about a theory, I am talking about something I know, so it doesn't matter to me whether or not those who have shown themselves prepared to argue the toss while handing out slurs believe me or not. The relevant people know, and if they want you in their little treehouse of horrors, I'm sure they'll invite you.

But, more relevantly, the standard of proof of guilt among Protestants is "reasonable doubt of innocence". This was established on US7's last thread, the one that was closed.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

[Gamecock]

MD: But if you're saying there is no collaboration among some on your side to make posts designed NOT to tell the truth, to put forward real arguments in a real quest for the truth, but to irritate, I won't believe you.

Reggie: I'm feeling left out.

If you're interested in joining the Vast Reformed Wing Conspiracy I can email the particulars.

We're having a meeting this weekend in Toledo but that 's all I can tell you in the open forum, after all I can't give away the gameplan.....