Is that a threat?
Other than some RC’s likely whining and wailing, I have no idea what resulted in my banning.
I have not engaged in the slightest blasphemy of Mary.
1. Mary is not God.
2. Blasphemy occurs against God and God alone. Mere humans don’t qualify for the word.
3. I have nothing at all against the authentic Mary.
4. I have a long list of discomfort with the outrageous blasphemies the RC edifice piles on top of Mary with an incredibly horribly over the line list of brazenly untrue hogwash—junk that the authentic Mary is likely outraged about if she’s at all allowed to even know such in her period of rest from such matters.
5. This is an open thread. My understanding of the criteria and standards is that folks tooooo thin-skinned to be comfortable here should go elsewhere.
6. I’ve been quite mild in my postings, today. I’d say, certainly comparatively—exceedingly mild. I realize that some RC’s have an evidently endless capacity and creativity for fabricating silk purses out of hogwallow muck. I shall continue to trust God in such matters.
7. I have no doubt that quite a significant number of RC anatomy sites are well imprinted with the abuse button from their sitting marathons. I don’t find that admirable nor useful . . . nor even wise.
However, feel free to do as you see fit as far as I’m concerned. I have a strong bias that individuals have to make their own choices and bear the consequences.
8. I can’t even IMAGINE what triggered such an outlandish, outrageously inaccurate reply. Fascinating.
LOLOLOLOL