Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix

>>If anything, it convinces us all the more emphatically that taking Scripture at face value wherever remotely possible is the best and most accurate,<<

So where does it say “Blood Brothers”?


1,233 posted on 06/02/2008 7:38:46 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

AS I understand it

in the root word meanings and in the contexxt.


1,265 posted on 06/02/2008 8:06:20 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom; Quix
So where does it say “Blood Brothers”?

Absolutely true. In fact I don't believe the term "blood brother" is used anywhere in Scripture.

Carry that logic forward and you can become convinced there were no blood brothers mentioned in Scripture.

Peter and Andrew, not mentioned as "blood brothers" could not have been blood brothers could they?

1,511 posted on 06/03/2008 1:14:22 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson