The article argues for both predestination and free will because scripture contains both.
If you exclude one you have to proof-text and spin mightily.
Anyway, here's some of its scriptural references:
Romans 11:33
Isaiah 1: 19
I Tim. 2:4-5
John 3:16
John 5:29
I Tim. 2:5
I Peter 5:7
Matt. 18:14
Psalm 49:1
Ecclesiastes 15:14
Is.55,20
Deut.10:17
Acts 27:3 1
Plenty of practice in that department.
D-fendr, I object to your post and will not answer you for three reasons.
First, you and I have already had this conversation at length. I do not intend on beating a dead horse as far as you are concerned.
Second, I object to your post based upon the fact that you have closed your mind concerning the subject and are not interested in the truth, just in arguing. I base this upon your words in the post I am replying to where you basically write off any answer to the contrary of what you have assumed as "proof-texting" and "spinning". You haven't even waited for the answer before you dismiss it.
Third, I object to your post and will not provide you an answer because of your anti-Protestant bigotry. You mock the idea of proof-texting (from your opponents) and then go on and proof-text yourself. You can use all of the tools you wish but decide to allow us none in answer to your response. Sorry, if those are the rules of the debate, we are not interested in participating.
With that said, Proof-texting is a WONDERFUL thing. Roman Catholics mock it, but it is what God wants us to do (Acts 17:11, Acts 17:2, Acts 18:28, Romans 15:4) . We do not speak on our own authority but on the authority of God's Word.
The verses you posted are cherry picked Scripture. Most of them did not support your point when taken in the context and two of the verses did not exist. You can not take Scripture out of its full context. There is an answer to the verses you posted, but I shall not be providing it for the reasons stated above.